Translate this page:

**
The Consequences
of Using Large Numbers as Codes:**

*
By Ijaz Chaudry*

The mathematical miracle of 19 occurs
when a code (a number) based on the chapter and verses of the Quran completely
divide by 19.

There is just over 5% chance that a
number could be completely divisible by 19. This fact is based on figures
derived from number 100.19, 38, 57, 76, 95 are all the numbers in 100 which are
completely divisible by 19.

The code is made up of arranged order of
numbers. Before we get to the codes and how they are driven, we need to look
briefly at how permutations of numbers work. We take a random number 5 and
calculate its permutations. Permutation is how many ordered combination a number
could have. Permutation of 5 is as follows;

5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 120. The derived
number 120 is the amount of ordered combinations number 5 can have.

In order to visualise this concept, we
take much smaller number of entity. The entity is 3 alphabets which are arranged
into all its ordered combinations, as follows;

The following is an example of 3
elements in a set with their full permutations;

First we find out the number of
permutations number 3 has;

3 x 2 x 1 = 6;

Now we arrange these letters to
illustrate how 6 permutations work;

A b c, b a c, c a b, a c b, b c a, c b
a;

As you can see each set of letters like
“a b c” is unique in its combination and that in the universal set of all six
combinations, we have exhausted maximum number of ordered combinations.

Now let’s take some more examples in
order to see how relatively vast the permutations get;

Two Hundred;

5% of 200 is 200 x 0.05 = 10; this
calculation is to do with calculating proportion of numbers within 200, which
would be numbers which completely divide by 19. As described earlier there is
about 5% probability that a number could be divisible of 19.

Now the permutations of 10 are as
follows;

10 x 9 x 8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 =
3,628,800;

So you can envisage something like “a b
c d e f g h I j” as an entity of 10 alphabets, which needs to combine in all
possible ways, similar to the example of 3 alphabets earlier. Now consider each
alphabet to be part of the code, it could be a chapter number, a verse number or
geometric value. Only one combination of these numbers would be a code.

This calculation tells us that there
could be over 3 and half million ordered combinations from which only one
correct ordered combination is the code we would be after.

Million:

This is a similar calculations as above
(1000,000 x 0.05 = 50,000) and when we want to have all its permutations the
number is so large that it will not be countable.

However, this is not the whole story
because this number (50,000) is reduced further if we are limiting the code to
certain number of digits. For example if we want the code to be between 900,000
and 1,000,000 which is the difference of 100,000 than we need only consider
(100,000 x 0.05 = 5000) 5000 which is still a huge number when converted into
its permutations.

[4:123] It is not in accordance with
your wishes, or the wishes of the **people of the scripture**: anyone who
commits evil pays for it, and will have no helper or supporter against GOD.

The code which follows is trying to
confirm who the people of the scripture are addressed in this verse. Two
geometric values of scriptures are used in this code Torah (1036) & Gospel or
Injeel in Arabic (94). The constraints on this code is that the chapter number
always appear before the verse this is common sense and logical, however verse
can also appear on its own like in this code. The other aspect generally of a
code is to take time in consideration called “Temporal connection”, as you can
see Gv of Injeel (Gospel) appear first in the code. This means Gospel is the
latest of the two scriptures. The code looks as follows;

941036 123 = 49528217 x 19

The total number of permutations for 9
digits as in above code is as follows;

9 x 8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 =
362880;

So the unique code above is part of over
three and half hundred thousand ordered combinations. So the question might be
asked why did I not take 5% of 9 ? This is because the code is multiple of 19
which suggests that 5% constraints have already been applied, to the number
system.

With large numbers the chance of getting
multiples of 19 increases ten folds, however this happens at a cost, because out
of thousands of multiples 19 codes only 1 code has to be the correct code and
the probability of finding that code becomes very scarce.